Status Update 1/21/09
The Website has been updated to reflect the current status of our
retiree medical efforts. Check it out at: http://home.comcast.net/~jrequa/retiree.htm
I have another response from UC on why they are not providing our
medical coverage. It is as follows:
ŇDear Mr. Requa:
Executive Vice President Lapp has asked me to follow-up with you
regarding your inquiry to her dated December 24, 2008 regarding your retiree
medical coverage. As you point
out, your pension benefits continue to be paid from the University of
California Retirement Plan (UCRP), but your health care benefits are now paid
by the company that currently manages Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
(LLNL) under contract with the Department of Energy (DOE).
Your pension benefits continue to be paid from UCRP because they
are funded by the UCRP trust.
During the time you were employed at LLNL as a UC employee, you became
an active member in the UCRP and accrued retirement benefits in which you
became fully vested under the terms of the plan document. During that period, the University and
members made contributions to the UCRP trust to the extent necessary to keep the
plan actuarially sound so the promised benefits could be paid. The DOE reimbursed the University for
the contributions made to the UCRP trust on behalf of LLNL active members while
the UC-DOE contract was in effect.
The trust is a separate entity legally distinct from the University, and
its assets cannot be used for any purpose other than to pay for benefits to
members and their beneficiaries and to defray administrative expenses. Those assets are still held in the UCRP
trust so your pension benefits continue to be paid from UCRP.
UC retiree health care costs, in contrast, are paid from the
UniversityŐs general assets on a pay-as-you-go basis. There was no prefunding for such costs during your
employment. While LLNL was managed
by UC, the DOE reimbursed UC for the retiree health care costs incurred by
former LLNL employees on a yearly basis as required by the UC-DOE contract that
ended in 2007. Under the new
management contract, the DOE is obligated to reimburse the new contractor,
Lawrence Livermore National Security (LLNS), for the retiree health care costs
incurred by former LLNL employees.
Thus, the obligation to provide the health care also has been
transferred to LLNS.
Your employment has not been transferred from UC under the
DOE-LLNS contract. You are a
former UC employee and, as such, will always be part of the UC community. The obligation to manage your retiree
health benefits, however, is now the responsibility of the successor contractor
to provide for ongoing funding.
We appreciate hearing from you and hope that you have taken
advantage of the services and features provided under the health and welfare
plans offered by LLNS.
John R. Cammidge, Acting Associate Vice President, Human Resources
and Benefits
I am formulating an appropriate response and will send it around
when it is ready.
There will be another article on LLNL Retirees in tomorrowŐs
Independent newspaper. It will contain the URL for the Web Site and the retiree
email address. Hopefully it will reach additional retirees. At the moment, I
have about 70 people on my mailing list.
In the next few weeks, I will be organizing a new round of letter
writing. I want to give Steven Chu a chance to settle in as Secretary of DOE
before we hit him. Dianne Feinstein responded to Bob RalstonŐs letter pointing
out that we were using the wrong input slot for help. Now that we know the
right slot, we will use it. I am going to try to find the right input slot for
Barbara Boxer so we can target her. If any of you know what it is or know how
to find out, I would appreciate the help. Ellen Tausher is also on the list as
well as UC. Since we want to present a united front, it is time to pick a name
for our group. Please send in your suggestions.
The following link is brought to you by Greg Bianchini. It points
to an article in the San Jose Mecury Times about our loosing out medical
benefits.
http://www.pnhp.org/news/2008/december/lawrence_livermore_r.php
I am still working on legal representation. I have one last lawyer
who has not ignored me or told me no. Unfortunately, he was sick over the
holidays so things are moving slowly.
I met with John Stedman this afternoon. He suggests we form a pair
of Political Action committees and plan on a long-term fight. I would like to try to have things
settled soon enough that we could join the UC open enrollment this fall, but I
donŐt see any reason we shouldnŐt have both short and long term strategies in
play at the same time. If there are any political junkies out there that would
love a chance play in the state or federal arenas, please let me know. In fact,
if there are any of you that know anything at all about setting up PACs I could
use a short course.